Wednesday, 22 January 2020

Stumbled onto yet another hostless Oscars ceremony



The Oscars are such an amazing time of the year. Each year there is an insane influx of beautiful films, the resurgence of directors who do not produce a film per month but instead spend time on their craft, speculation about Brad Pitt’s love life and unnecessary insults to the MCU. And that has been the case since the very first ceremony in 1929.

I have been a faithful viewer for the past six or seven years, which may not sound like a lot but considering they start at 1am on Sunday night/Monday morning depending on what kind of person you are, I consider myself a very dedicated viewer. My favourite bit of the Oscars tends to be the host monologue, the jokes, the performance, the references, the dabs, the food (!) and I am therefore incredibly annoyed that for two years in a row they have decided to go hostless. As if the host is equivalent to an animal product I have given up for stupid Veganuary! This is possibly an unrelated rant. And in order to top that up, I have read so many articles praising this decision to go hostless! Practical arguments for the hostless Oscars include runtime, presenters taking the lead with the bits and the comedy, previous hosts having been involved in some controversy, some financials that obviously no one but the people on the Oscars committee cares about. But they are all missing the point; which is I love hosts.

I don’t necessarily mean Ricky Gervais should bring his Golden Globes game to the Oscars; let’s be honest, if they could not handle Kevin Hart’s homophobic tweets from a thousand years ago, no one ever associated with Gervais could host this thing. But that doesn’t mean no one at all should host. Jimmy Kimmel and Jon Stewart have previously brought a late night television vibe to the Oscars, with their ongoing Matt Damon feuds and their political humour popping up every now and then. I am of course addicted to late night and therefore have gone back more than once to look up the monologues and will not rest until the rightful late night host presents the ceremony! Oscar Wilde was, after all, Irish! Bring out the American Ginger! Apart from personal preferences, if anyone has the credentials to keep a crowd going for four hours, or however long the Oscars last, keep good track of the time and resolve tension when Warren Beatty announces the wrong winner, it is the talk show hosts! Any one of them would bring some character to the ceremony, at least the first time round. Apart from Jimmy Fallon. If he ever gets the Oscars, I will personally fly to New York and burn NBC to the ground. Wheel of musical impressions, my ass.

It doesn’t even have to be established hosts. Hugh Jackman brought out his angelic voice and vibrant moves for the ceremony, reminding us all why ‘Wolverine: Heart Not Made of Adamantium’ is not the Broadway musical we deserve, but it is the Broadway musical we need. Neil Patrick Harris even did a semi-decent job with similar props and a catchy song about ‘Moving Pictures’ (instead of ‘Motion Pictures’, which was a nice touch). Both were a much more beautiful spectacle than, well, nothingness. I mean Hugh Jackman is a much more beautiful spectacle than most things. NPH possibly also, but not more beautiful than Hugh Jackman. Bub.

Of course, not all hosts go down well in history. Not all hosts do well. But is there anything more enjoyable than the Oscars presented by Ann Hathaway and James Franco? You are left there trying to trace back the thought process that led to this pairing. You try to figure out what happened in rehearsal that did not alert the organisers that this was a mistake. You try to decide if James Franco was high. And start wondering if this wasn’t all a plot by Seth Rogen so that he could then be the more popular of the two. Franco has helped Rogen’s case since then, of course. This ceremony is probably my favourite, I flourish in awkwardness and cringeworthiness and I am certainly not the only one. I want them to try and get good hosts, and possibly the ultimate host whose name rhymes with O’Ryan, but I don’t mind when they mess up. There is certainly a quote in some culture about trying and failing rather than not trying at all.

This will be a good year for the Oscars, movie-wise. A lot of the contenders have excelled in all fronts and it promises to be an interesting race. I mean, the worst of the nominated films I have seen is the Joker and that is still quite good. I will swallow my bitterness about the lack of a host and enjoy as much of the ceremony as I can. Hopefully Amy Poehler, Tina Fey and Maya Rudolph will save the day for the second year in a row with a short monologue that they could easily have performed as hosts. But sure, the ceremony might be ten minutes shorter.

No comments:

Post a Comment